Update 4:41 p.m. 11/4/26: This story has been refreshed with Wednesday afternoon’s incremental election returns.
San Francisco Democrats had plenty to celebrate Tuesday as their party captured both houses of Congress, delivering a sharp rebuke to President Donald Trump. For local progressives, the view closer to home was considerably more complicated.
Mayor Daniel Lurie claimed a mandate Wednesday for his government overhaul and affordability agenda. His allies held commanding leads in several supervisor races, while progressive hopes for a public bank and a new housing fund faced uncertain or discouraging returns.
The competing moods were palpable at election-night gatherings. At Connie Chan’s congressional watch party, supporters cheered national Democratic victories while watching their candidate fall behind state Sen. Scott Wiener.
“But here in San Francisco, it’s still big money that’s controlling us,” said Albert Chow, a trailing District 4 supervisor candidate.
The numbers remain preliminary. By Wednesday’s 4 p.m. report, the city had counted 206,32o ballots, up 21,288 from Tuesday night’s final update. Officials estimated another 135,000 remained uncounted. All local percentages below reflect Wednesday’s fifth report. For more details, see our results page.
Big night for the mayor


Lurie’s billionaire-backed “Clean Up City Hall” campaign, supported by a pooled committee with $13.8 million according to the San Francisco Chronicle, produced substantial leads:
- Proposition D, which would quadruple signature requirements for voter initiatives: 57.54% yes.
- Proposition E, expanding the city administrator’s contracting and technology authority: 66.88% yes.
- Proposition F, expanding mayoral control over departments and restoring deputy mayors: 62.59% yes.
“The voters have given us a mandate, and now it’s our responsibility to deliver,” Lurie said in a Wednesday statement. The Chronicle has declared all three measures passed. Supporters promise efficiency and accountability, but critics warn of concentrated power in the executive branch and barriers to grassroots organizing if Proposition D is certified.
Separately, Proposition A, restructuring departments and commissions, had 70.51% support.
Lurie’s appointees Stephen Sherrill and Alan Wong led their supervisor contests with 90.79% and 75.91%, respectively, in the last preliminary ranked-choice rounds. Incumbent Matt Dorsey had 80.77%, and Lurie-endorsed Theo Ellington had 66.97%. Gary McCoy led District 8 with 64.20%, although Mission Local’s reporting complicates a moderate-sweep narrative: the labor-backed candidate could be less reliably aligned with Lurie than outgoing Supervisor Rafael Mandelman.
Bringing the issues to Washington
Wiener led Chan 55.46% to 44.54% Wednesday afternoon. His campaign had raised nearly $5.8 million, compared with $2.4 million for Chan, according to Federal Elections Commission data compiled by Ballotpedia. Their contest exposed divisions over housing, political donors and artificial intelligence regulation, despite agreement on other priorities, including raising Social Security’s payroll-tax cap.
For Chan supporters, the race also carried hopes of electing San Francisco’s first Chinese American congressional representative. Wiener would become the city’s first openly LGBTQ representative in Congress.
At Chan’s gathering, Arab Resource and Organizing Center executive director Lara Kiswani urged persistence: “No matter what happens, and we don’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow, we’re going to get back to work.”


Affordability connected these battles, even where proposed solutions divided voters. Public Press reporter Cami Dominguez, who covers Latinos in San Francisco, told KALW Tuesday that the community is far from politically uniform, but interviews consistently return to living costs. Concerns once centered on rent increasingly include affording basic necessities.

Other measures
Proposition C, expanding Housing Trust Fund contributions, had 80.27% support, reflecting a coalition spanning Lurie and progressive housing advocates. But Proposition I, dedicating transfer-tax revenue to affordable housing and tenant assistance, trailed with 45.25% yes.
Proposition B, laying groundwork for a public bank, drew closer: 49.96% yes, trailing by just 144 votes, compared with 630 in Tuesday night’s final report.
Transit offered broader common ground. Proposition H, a parcel tax for Muni operations, had 72.79% support. The regional transit sales tax had 77.91% in San Francisco, though its outcome depends on five counties. The Chronicle declared both passed.
Proposition G, reopening the Upper Great Highway to weekday traffic, faced 63.57% opposition. Proposition J, ending a transfer-tax exemption for large foreclosed properties, had 79.47% support.
State results add another wrinkle. Proposition 40, the one-time billionaire tax, trailed statewide with 44.4% support, while Proposition 42, prohibiting new state personal-property taxes and certain retroactive taxes, led with 54.3%. San Francisco went the other way: 52.83% supported the billionaire tax, and 59.15% opposed the tax restrictions.
The next city report is scheduled for 4 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 5. Ballots postmarked by Election Day can arrive through Nov. 10. Nothing is certified. Follow our results page for updates and our voter guide for what the measures would change.
